Three Episodes in the Criminal History of the British Empire
- by Subversify Staff
- Posted on 29 July, 2011
The crimes of the British, during their phase of Empire, were, in essence, no different to the crimes of the Americans, the Japanese, the Moghuls, the Maoris, the Russians, the Incas, the French and countless other groups of violent, self-directed men, who have found themselves in positions of power and dominance. The following short account is not an attempt to single out the British for villification, rather to shed some light on an area of history which receives little or no media attention; particularly, of course, in the UK, where discussion of officially-sanctioned theft and murder casts the corporate-state and its incumbents in a criminal light. One is as unlikely to read of war crimes in the Sudan and Malaysia, concentration camps in South Africa and Kenya, financing and support of genocide in Indonesia or the theft of Diego Garcia in the UK press as one is to read of the invasion of Vietnam, the bombing of Laos and Cambodia, mass extermination in the Philippines, terrorism in Nicaragua and El Salvador, and official support for Sadam Hussein, Doc Duvalier, Augusto Pinochet and other genocidal tyrants in the US.
Here then are three very brief accounts of the British Empire’s criminal involvement with three countries; China during the opium wars, India during two Bengal famines and the creation of Israel.
China – The Opium Wars
“By the 1830s the British Empire was the largest drug’s pusher the world has ever seen,” writes historian, John Newsinger. Opium was, according to the Cambridge History of China, “the world’s most valuable single-commodity trade of the nineteenth century,” and its trade, according to historian, John K Fairbanks, without any doubt, “the most long-continued and systematic crime of modern times.”
Although grown in British India the use of Opium there was prohibited as it had a disastrous effect on productivity. Its export to China however was hugely lucrative. By 1838 an astonishing 2500 tonnes a year were being exported; bankrolling the entire British empire. James Matheson, partner in one of the largest financial and trading companies in the world, Jardin Matheson and Co (still a huge corporation) used the profits he made from opium to buy a Hebridean Island for the colossal sum of £500,000, forcibly evict its 500 inhabitants (part of the brutal clearances of the Scottish highlands) and ship them off to Canada, build a castle, buy himself a seat in the House of Commons and chair the P&O shipping company which went on to become the major opium carrier of the nineteenth century.
When the Chinese resisted this state of affairs the British responded with a war that, due to Britain’s massive technological advantage, turned into one massacre after another; the town of Jinhai, for example, was bombarded with hundreds of battleships, before troops moved in to take on wounded peasants armed with bows and arrows. They then raped and pillaged the devastated town. “A more complete pillage could not be conceived… the plunder only ceased when there was nothing to take or destroy,” wrote the India Gazette. The British lost three men, and the Chinese over 2000. The story of Jinhai was repeated over and over again. Eventually the Chinese capitulated, allowed Britain “free trade” access, and handed over Hong Kong to them.
Over the next twenty years two more Opium wars followed, with Britain (assisted by the French) massacring and plundering on a colossal scale and, after each victory, gaining more power over China, including new territories. By the end of the century Britain was exporting 6000 tonnes of Opium a year to China.
William Gladstone, MP and later Prime Minister, recorded in his diary that he was “in dread of the judgement of God upon England for our national iniquity towards China.”
India – The Bengal Famine
The Moghuls (the group that destroyed Indian culture and civilisation before the British) knew Bengal as “the paradise of the earth” and an early European traveller, physician Francois Bernier called it “the finest and most fruitful country in the world.” Bengal was an area of astonishing beauty, abundance, refinement and equality. The people were noted for their exuberance and affection, the exported goods unequalled in quality and destitution was unknown: villagers owned the land they tended and not even bankruptcy could evict them.
In 1769, five years after the British had taken control, it was the poorest province in India. Vast amounts of money and produce flowed out of the area, taxes skyrocketed to the point where farmers had to sell their children to pay it, barriers on English trade vanished and where once gold and silver had flowed into Bengal, it now poured out in torrents until all commercial activities were at a standstill.
When the rains failed, in 1770, British officers and their Indian agents, recognising that the value of rice would shoot up, bought all the rice in the area. Huge amounts of grain were appropriated by the British – enough to feed the population, but, as with the Irish potato famine, it was all exported at enormous profit (one clerk, who ordinarily made £200 pounds a year, sent home £60,000 pounds during the famine – a colossal sum).
With a failed harvest, no grain stored to eat and no money or valuables to trade or buy rice from neighbouring provinces, the people of Bengal died. A third of the population, about ten million people, died of hunger.
The response of the British was to raise taxes, increase the severity of non-payment, uphold the rights of creditors (until lands had passed from farmers to moneylenders) buy up or conquer neighbouring provinces, and further extort the rest of India until, when further famines hit, other parts of the country were devastated in the same manner as Bengal.
India never recovered, but the horrors visited upon it by the British continued for a century and a half, up until Bengal’s final devastating famine, in 1943, which the British helped cause (by its “scorched earth” policy of defence against the advancing Japanese) and which Churchill – who, in his own words, “hated Indians… a beastly people and a beastly religion” – refused to ameliorate. The issue of Bengal starving was repeatedly raised in the War Cabinet, but time after time, despite the enormous sacrifices India had made for the British war effort, and despite both grain and boats being freely available, Churchill refused to send help. Between three and ten million people starved to death.
The Formation of Israel
At the start of the twentieth century Britain wished to keep Palestine under their control, as it was strategically well-placed. They saw the incipient Zionist hope to settle the then stateless Jews in the area as a way of strengthening their claim to Palestine and introducing a loyal and dependent population into the area. When, in 1922, the League of Nations (forerunner to the UN) awarded Britain control over Palestine, the British began to put the plan of populating the area with European Jews into action and turning the inhabitants of Palestine into “existing non-Jewish communities.”
In the 1930s the Zionist movement found it shared a common interest in the eviction of Jews from Europe with the German Nazis. In 1935 Reinhard Heydrich, one of the architects of the Holocaust, proclaimed his solidarity with Zionism, Adolf Eichmann, another key Nazi figure, visited Palestine in 1937 at the invitation of the Zionists and the Gestapo worked closely with the precursor to Mossad to get Jews out of Europe and into Palestine.
Tens and then hundreds of thousands of Jewish immigrants poured into Palestine with British and German assistance. As Jews were evicted from their homes by Nazis, Arabs were evicted from theirs by the arriving Jews, either forcibly, or through impoverishment due to inflation caused by the influx of Jewish capital.
Palestinians, understandably, did not enjoy leaving their homes and being governed by a foreign power and foreign settlers and in 1936 “the great revolt” began. The British responded by bringing in huge quantities of troops, mass arrests, shootings, torture and the indiscriminate blowing up, burning down and bombing of Palestinian towns (Arthur “Bomber” Harris, the dambuster “hero”, recommended “one 250 lb or 500 lb bomb in each village that speaks out of turn”). “Pacification” of the country took three years and was carried out with astonishing brutality.
After the second world war the Zionists felt strong enough to break with Britain. In 1948, with the support of the Soviet Union and the US, the Zionists established the state of Israel, driving out a further 700,000 Palestinians from their homes in the infamous ethnic cleansing known as ‘plan Dalet’.
The story since then has continued in the same way, with the US taking the role that Britain once had, of Israeli arms supplier, military adviser, financier and, in numerous UN resolutions calling for a universally approved two-state settlement, the sole obstacle to peace. The US currently ships three billion dollars of military aid a year to Israel; to “defend” themselves against Palestinians. In the 2008 ‘Operation Cast Lead’ offensive, to pick one example of many, Israel attacked Gaza with hundreds of bombing raids and thousands of artillery and tanks shells, killing 1,400 Palestinians. 14 Israelis were killed with home-made rockets.
It should be noted that many of these crimes were not, literally speaking, crimes at all, in that they were either outside of the reach, or sanctioned by, “law” – aka “the declarative will of the conquerors, how they will have their subjects to be ruled.” Its worth noting, in conclusion, what Gerrard Winstanley, one of the first free men to rise up against the British, had to say about this fact; “Freedom is in the man who will turn the world upside down, therefore no wonder he has enemies.”
Jane Austen and the Black Hole of British History: Gideon Maxwell Polya
The Decline & Fall of the British Empire: Piers Brendon
The Blood Never Dried: John Newsinger
Year 501: Noam Chomsky
Churchill’s Secret War: Madhusree Mukerjee
Pax Britinnica Trilogy: Jan Morris
Web of Deceit: Mark Curtis
Unpeople: Mark Curtis
Hidden Agendas: John Pilger
Soil and Soul: Alastair McIntosh
Newspeak in the 21st Century: MediaLens
Oxford History of the British Empire
Darren Allen- Here are three brief accounts of the British Empire’s criminal involvement with three countries; China during the opium wars, India during the Bengal famines and the creation of Israel.
You’re likely to have several people tell you that the creation of Israel wasn’t a crime – although I’ve studied enough of the region’s history in pursuit of two degrees that I’d agree with you.
Balfour, Allenby and the rest are forever damned in my eyes for their part in destroying the lives of the people of Palestine, all in the name of their ‘god’.
We’ll be cleaning up that mess for another century or more.
Funny how we have a tendency to forget that other countries have as colorful and blundering a history of International invasion as the United States, but colonialism didn’t spring magically up from the ground. Wherever groups of people got together and decided their system of social status, religious orientation and values(generally disguised as quality of life and advanced technology) was superior to all others, conquest became a justifiable means of stealing from others for personal gain. In their minds, they believe that despite their carnage, they are doing the inhabitants a favor, for they are heathen. The survivors are given a chance to join their ranks once they understand the terms of acquisition. What they don’t see is that they are barbarians, with a barbaric ancestry of Huns, Goths, Vikings and Normans, who also used their technology to plunder and pillage. The heathens would be socially embarrassed to be rude in public. This social respect is what actually marks an enduring civilization, not the number of buildings that can be raised, the fire power manufactured or the accumulation of unnecessary material wealth. Colonialism is decadence and the sooner it’s put the rest, the better off we all will be as we begin fashioning a new civilization built on understanding instead of conquest.
As a citizen of a nation that has suffered immensely under the British, I not only agree with you but would tell you that there are no more ruthless and brutal people on Earth than the British government. They will cheerfully sacrifice their own people (and throw their allies in the bin without a thought) in order to advance their own agendas. This same Churchill was also responsible for so many war crimes that it turns any modern reader’s stomach (except for a British person of my acquaintance, whose grasp on history is vague at best).
Nicely done. It is telling our love/hate relationship with our parents from the Isles here in the U.S. We worked so hard to get away and then set out to emulate them as best we could.
So many Americans don’t realize our own involvement in both the British colonization, via building and industry and our own colonization which continues, Think Puerto Rico and Guam.
Bill, I would suggest that your singling out the British government for particular opprobrium is because your nation has been a recipient of British violence. Governments and groups of concentrated power are the same everywhere.
It’s funny to read that Englishmen were – oh, what a surprise! – as cruel as Russians. Funny and sad. Because it shows that the more standard worldview is that Russians had been more cruel than Englishmen till 1917. Sorry but how many cultures, states or ethnic groups did Russians annihilate? The answer is – not a single one. All ethnic groups, both big and small, who encountered Russians in the course of the history are still alive, still speak their languages, preserve their culture, religion, habits etc.
Now compare it to what Englishmen did to the Irish or to Scots. It can’t be compared! Russians were and are much more soft and showed much more understanding toward other nations and ethnic groups.
Moreover Russians themselves have been victims of genocides more often than any other nation. Have Englishmen ever been a victim of genocide? No.
And the last thing – the USSR wasn’t Russia and Russians were victims of the bloody communist region as much as any other ethnic group in the USSR – if not more.
Never forget…Wales and cornwall, the old briton cultures were the english state’s first and oldest colony…..the english ppl have no real say, just hoodwinked by elites