The Obama Problem

By Keith Heumiller

By conventional standards, the character of our current president seems relatively solid. He’s a former Chicago lawyer, golden-tongued Senator and a well-to-do family man. He’s trying to quit smoking, battle a seething wave of congressional Republicans, and balance the whims of his populace with a moldering national financial statement. He’s going gray, as he should be, but he’s still getting up once a month to post a YouTube video and stoke the fires of his under 40 voter base, still having somebody tweet for him, still trying to remain the Obama we all remember from that epic 2008 campaign.

But solid character is not necessarily a positive. Dubya, you remember, was forever the free-wheeling, boot-stomping Midwest rancher. Reagan, at least on camera, rarely stepped out of his smiling, grandfatherly public persona. In truth, the American presidency has been at least 60% a game of appearances since the JFK/Nixon debates. After all, only a fool would change so much as his hairdo after being elected to the highest office in the land. If your goose lays a golden egg, you don’t  go changing its food.

But who among us is the same person they were three years ago? Where were you in 2008? Who were you dating? As the world around us shifts and pitches, humans naturally adjust their daily motivations and opinions to fit. But a president doesn’t have this luxury. He must abide his campaign promises, he must perpetuate the man he put on display throughout his campaign. And herein lies the Obama problem.

Rendition


If you asked Bradley Manning what he thought of our current president’s character, I’m sure he wouldn’t have a lot to say. Mainly because he’s currently losing his mind after nearly a year in solitary confinement for supplying Wikileaks with confidential military documents. Manning, originally placed in solitary “for his own safety” on suicide watch, has been kept there long after the watch was lifted with no mention, let alone explanation, from the Obama administration. Nor has there been any discussion of the targeting of U.S. citizens in Yemen, the warrantless surveillance of Islamic charities here in the U.S, and the persistent and unapologetic defense of Bush-era torture and rendition policies across the globe. Obama does not tweet about such things.

The problem, of course, is one of image. Obama essentially campaigned as the anti-Bush; an intelligent, well-spoken black man with his sights set on restoring the American brand in the global marketplace. He promised countless times to grease the cogs of federal machinery with “transparency” and “honesty.” So, when he is forced to use the “state secrets” defense in court, when he has to stand up and say that all of vicious atrocities committed on behalf of Dubya’s henchmen in the War on Terror were necessary – even moral – he finds himself at noticeable odds with the man we saw promising his daughters a puppy during that Oscar-nominated acceptance speech three Novembers ago.

This disjunct is complicated because it occurs on two fronts. First, we have Obama defending via policy and court action the very policies and military actions that he so violently condemned in his campaign. Wire-tapping, torture, cloak-and-dagger deals, Blackwater; these were quite often the setup pieces he used to launch into an anti-Bush, anti-Republican harangue about personal rights and due process. His first act of office, you remember, was closing Guantanamo Bay. Right after buying the puppy.

Secondly, we have Obama utilizing the “state secrets” defense – saying that if, for example, a suspected terrorist who is captured by the CIA, flown to a foreign country, tortured for two years, and ultimately proven innocent decides to sue the United States for damages and suffering; the Justice Department can state that his testimony in the case could reveal classified information  and potentially put American citizens in jeopardy, effectively closing the case and shipping the plaintiff back to his home country with nothing. This, again, is a picture-perfect throwback to the Bush era policy of hiding unconstitutional or explicitly illegal policies behind the curtain of “classified information.” Every time Obama talked about transparency, he referred specifically to this practice.

Matriculation


Some, of course, would contend that this image/action disconnect is fundamental to the job. Every president has to do dirty things that a middle-aged soccer mom from Illinois doesn’t want to hear about, and every president is forced to keep these things quiet in the name of national security. Obama is doing the best he can within the system.

Others, including Bradley Manning, would say otherwise. Just a few weeks ago, Obama unveiled his new rallying cry: “Winning the Future: Responsibility, Reform, Results.” This, of course, has nothing to do with government. It’s aimed at education. As I write this, I’m watching our president talk at Miami Central High School. To his right, Jeb Bush. For a moment I thought I was hallucinating. I had to go back step by step and make sure I hadn’t ingested anything in the last 24 hours that would lead to disturbing psychotropic images, but no. Just Froot Loops. President Barack Obama has teamed up with Jeb Bush, Dubya’s brother, in Florida to grandstand about what a great job he’s been doing and how bipartisan he’s been and how much he cares about the kids. All of it, of course, bullshit. He’s only in Florida raising money for Bill Nelson’s reelection fund, and Jeb Bush is trying to jump on this “clean up our schools” fun happy feelgoodtime bandwagon and ride it into a Senate seat of his own. Meanwhile Manning rots in a cell with no window, no pillow, no communication and no access to the outside world. Because he provided the sort of “government transparency” Obama promised us in the first place.

Pop quiz hot shot. Who said the following:

“’We only know these crimes took place because insiders blew the whistle at great personal risk… Government whistleblowers are part of a healthy democracy and must be protected from reprisal.”

A) Bradley Manning
B) John Adams
C) Barack Obama
D) Guillermo the Tram King, a violent meth-addicted homeless man in San Francisco
Google it and find out.

The Fallen Curtain


But the real question here is why. Why is Bradley Manning rotting month after month in a 5×8 concrete cell instead of standing trial for his actions? Are the military courts really that bogged down with whistleblower cases at the moment? Of course not. The point here is Interrogation. The Obama administration has proven beyond any doubt that it is hell-bent on squashing Wikileaks like a diseased apple-stealing rodent. It pressured companies like Paypal, Amazon, Visa, and Mastercard to sever ties with the organization and has employed at least four informants with the task of infiltrating Wikileaks and disrupting it. Only a fool would think that Manning is being kept in jail because he’s “suicidal”. I refuse to believe there is a military general in this country dumb enough to think long-term solitary confinement is an effective treatment option for terminal depression. They are torturing him (Charles Dickens, who spent months at a time living with the general populations of prisons and mental hospitals throughout America in the 1800’s, wrote: “I believe [solitary confinement] to be cruel and wrong…I hold this slow and daily tampering with the mysteries of the brain to be immeasurably worse than any torture of the body”). The goal, obviously, is to elicit intelligence and/or cooperation from Manning, either before or after his spirit breaks completely. And Obama, ominously, refuses to discuss any of it in public.

The Obama problem rests as thus. He is not the independent-minded change maker we thought –or hoped – he was. He is not the black-jacketed Neo sent into our political Matrix to destroy the Smiths and free us all from the bonds of the System. He’s just a lowly pawn in a centuries-old partisan chess match, a rank-and-file Democrat who shocked party leaders by proving that he could speak like Ellison’s Invisible Man and debate like Bill Clinton, who even as president doesn’t seem to be in control of his own party. He was like a dull penny in the bottom of change jar, and it took the Democrats five years to figure out he had two Lincoln heads. Since Day One the donkey bigwigs have been using Obama’s powers for the good of the party, not the good of the nation, and it’s taken us a long time to see through the veneer.

If Bush had implemented all these new airport-based security procedures, no one would have turned their head to spit. But these backscatter X-ray machines  and genital-focused grope-downs were turned loose under Obama, in reaction to a would-be terrorist who boarded a plane in Amsterdam with explosives in his tightey whiteys. No one in his administration questioned why we were ramping up security in America when the clear flaw was in a Dutch airport, no one bothered to ask if this latest, substantially degrading loss of personal freedom was necessary at all. They just signed the multi-million dollar contract with American Science and Engineering and began installing potentially hazardous cancer boxes in every airport in the nation.

The Obama we elected would never compromise something he believed in for the sake of retaining voters, but again and again our president has dodged the question of legal gay marriage, saying only that he is “struggling” with the issue. 2008 Barack would never have allowed a foreign company to destroy a large swath of the Gulf coastline and get away without paying, but in January BP was allowed to write off 35% of their cleanup expenses and government-mandated penalties. In the end our government actually issued them a $10 billion tax credit, and the budget hole it created was ultimately filled by cuts in Pell Grants, funding for the arts, and heat stipends for the poor.

There was no American intervention in Egypt or Bahrain, still no intervention in Libya or any of the other conflicts in the Middle East or northern Africa in recent months. Libyan refugees are huddled in shit swamps near the Tunisian border, robbed of their money, clothes, and food by armed militants, and all we have to offer are well-timed “comments” by Hillary Clinton and Robert Gibbs in support of democracy. When two U.S. journalists were held captive in the Far East, it was Bill Clinton, not Obama, who flew in like the guy from the Dos Equis commercials to whisk the ladies away on a private jet and make suave jokes about “confidentiality” while he poured champagne and coyly offered them cigars.

Wait, news flash. Apparently it has been discovered that Bradley Manning was left naked in his cell for at least two days. CNN, of course, made sure to mention that “military officials claim it was not punitive, but only in an effort to keep Manning from harming himself.” Hm.

The upshot, after all this, is that Obama is no more a political rogue or “maverick” than John McCain or even George Bush. In fact, he’s a lot more like good ole Dubya than people give him credit for. Just ask Jeb. Anyone left in America or abroad holding out hope for a spontaneous turnaround or a vast restructuring of American politics prior to the election season of 2012 is in for a serious letdown. And anyone still clinging to the idea that Obama’s lofty ambitions or failed campaign promises were only dashed by contentious Republicans and ingrained political processes should contact me at once. I have a few bridges to sell you.

Obama’s “character” was as carefully crafted as Bush’s Texas homesteader act. He’s an excellent speaker and extremely intelligent for an American politician, but to the average citizen our president’s private life is as censored and managed as his smoking habit. (As a smoker, I can assure that no man, however powerful, would be able to quit smoking with a job like that. My guess is he’s got a hermetically sealed smokeroom in the basement, and it smells like the Harrah’s Atlantic City poker room on a Friday night.) For all we know, Obama could spend his evenings drawing up media strategies with some left-wing doppelganger for Karl Rove, granting convicted super-hackers unconditional immunity in exchange for help with the “Wikileaks problem”, or chasing two-dollar hookers around the Iron Horse Taproom. Yes, he tried a few novel things – not least of which the national health care system – but he’s proven all too willing to give up on them the second they prove dangerous to his political aspirations. Aspirations which more often than not seem conveniently coherent with the long-term health of the Democratic party.

The Apple Cart

 

According to Open Secrets, Democrats get most of their money from education lobbies, specifically the National Education Association and the American Federation of Teachers. Actually, one non-lobbyist group called ActBlue contributes more than both of these groups combined, but as an online collective that solicits mostly anonymous $200 donations it is (intentionally) impossible to know who or what is actually signing all those checks. But it’s safe to say that one of the top Democratic priorities for perdurable fiscal survival is allocating more government resources for education.

Which brings us back to the Obama and Jed Show in Florida on Friday, and his commitment to “Responsibility, Reform, and Results.” The tone of his speech was clear.

“Now, I want all the young people here to listen,” he said, “because over the next 10 years, nearly half of all new jobs are going to require a level of education that goes beyond a high school degree.  So, first of all, you can’t drop out.  You can’t even think about dropping out.  (Applause) But it’s not going to be enough just to graduate from high school.  You’re going to need some additional education.  And a good education equals a good job.  If we want more good news on the jobs front, then we’ve got to make more investments in education.  As a nation, making these investments -– in education, in innovation, in infrastructure – all of them are essential.”

Notice the word investments. Investment means money. Give schools money. And while we’re at it, give some money to infrastructure (#8 Democratic donor: American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees). But mainly schools. Stay in school, then go to college.
Ok, so we know that if more students stay in high school, the schools will need more money and Obama will be able to increase the amount he gives them. The top Democratic contributors will be appeased, and will give him money again in 2012. But why does he care about college? If all of those kids he’s talking to decide to go to a private school, the government gets nothing. And the teachers’ unions don’t care about PhDs teaching graduate-level physics at Stanford for $200k a year. Is Obama actually being altruistic?
Of course not. Even Bush was pushing our young little learners to study hard and go on to college. Remember where he was on 9/11? In these tough financial times, and all other times for that matter, the American higher education system produces some of the most consistent and effortless income our government can get its hands on.

In 2009 – statistics for 2010 are not available yet – undergraduate students borrowed $53,839,588,907 in subsidized and unsubsidized loans from the U.S. government. That’s 54 billion, at 3.5% APR. Graduate students borrowed another $3.5 billion, at 6%. In effect, presidents have the ability to coax legally underage students into a complicated, 20-year deferred-loan scheme on a national level and actually improve their image at the same time. Like Robin Hood, but back asswords and the public loves him for it anyway. By consistently plying the idea that college is the “right” choice for all American youth, by insinuating that the only people who don’t go to college are either too dumb or too lazy to get their lives together, Obama is paving the way for a nice economic boom if and when he has a second term. Thanks in part to the recent bankruptcy of Sallie Mae and other private student loan companies, the federal government has a veritable monopoly on the cash for college system. And now that higher education funding has been frozen or slashed at nearly every state college in the nation, the principle on those loans is going to be higher than ever. More college students in this current setup effectively equals a better financial resume for the Democrats to stand on in the 2014 and 2016 elections.

A Lesson


But the nut issue right now, of course, is Wisconsin. There seems to be no better recent symbol for the Obama problem in action. Initially, Obama came out and said flatly that Scott Walker’s stance against teachers “generally seems like more of an assault on unions.” But soon after, it seems, he remembered his image. 2008 Obama was not in bed with unions. He collected all of his campaign money in spare change and crumpled singles mailed in from the downtrodden and degraded all across America, online donations from laid-off construction workers with one leg and no health care. So he crawled down to the basement, chain smoked a pack of Newports, and rewrote his opinion:

“I know many of you are making decisions regarding your public work forces and I know how difficult that can be,” he said to a conference of American governors last week. “I recently froze the salaries of federal employees for two years. It wasn’t something I wanted to do, but I did it because of the very tough fiscal situation we are in. I believe that everybody should be prepared to give up something in order to solve our budget challenges. I think most public servants agree with that. Democrats and Republicans agree with that.”

Which, of course, translates to absolutely nothing. “I’m currently struggling with that issue. Next question please.” The truth of it all is that both Obama and his Democratic “advisors” have learned that doing nothing, saying nothing, is often a much better political strategy than pushing for “civil liberties” or “unprecedented legislation.” I wouldn’t be the first to suggest that the National Health Care Act cost Democrats the 2010 midterm elections. If Obama focused on health care, Republicans said he wasn’t working on the economy. If he worked on the deficit, they said he wasn’t working on jobs. If he worked on jobs, they said he was an Islamic socialist. After a while, Obama forgot about trying to get things done and instead leaned back on what got him elected in the first place. Talking.

Now he’s back to saying a lot without saying anything, planning a lot of projects he knows will never get done. If work actually begins on a comprehensive high speed rail system before gas costs $15 a gallon I’ll strip naked and dry hump the Washington monument in broad daylight. Like campaign finance reform, nationalized health care, cap-and-trade regulation, or government transparency, high speed rail is just an issue to get Americans thinking work is being done. A bill is introduced, maybe even passed in the House, and Obama gets on YouTube to tell the nation how he’s changing the world. A month or two later part of it is repealed, or defeated in the Senate, or reworded, and the whole thing quietly dissolves into thin, meaningless air. Then it’s on to the next one, one to next one, on the next one…

And it hurts. It really, truly hurts this time. A lot of people, myself included, pinned Obama as our last hope. A final stab at turning this whole sordid mess around. Watching this president’s veil drop is like finding the last remaining lifeboat on the Titanic and realizing it’s welded firmly to the deck.

Hope. It was all about hope with this one, and before we’re even halfway through next year’s election season there will be absolutely none left. Then, even the desperately optimistic among us will have to admit he’s more Democrat than savior, more politician than populist, more talk than walk. And all we’ll be left with is the cold, unsettling question: Who next?

10 Comments on “The Obama Problem”

  1. Waiting for the “next” savior is like Waiting for Godot. It’s a fool’s errand.

    The Corporatist-Militarist system is inherently sociopathic, so stop expecting it to produce anything humane or democratic.

    Only by dismantling this entire corrupt system will we have a chance at a survivable future. Collapse, both environmental snd economic, is more likely.

  2. First, congratulations on a well-written piece. You’re helping set the bar even higher here.

    Second:

    “The Obama problem rests as thus. He is not the independent-minded change maker we thought –or hoped – he was…He’s just a lowly pawn in a centuries-old partisan chess match, a rank-and-file Democrat who shocked party leaders by proving that he could speak like Ellison’s Invisible Man and debate like Bill Clinton…He was like a dull penny in the bottom of change jar…Since Day One the donkey bigwigs have been using Obama’s powers for the good of the party, not the good of the nation, and it’s taken us a long time to see through the veneer.”

    Your metaphors (pennies; change jars; pawns and chess) are well done – and while I appreciate the article (several parts, like this one, verily beg to be pull-quotes), plain-speaking gets the better of me.

    In short, I agree with you – but you’re being much, much too nice to the man and his building legacy.

    Somewhere on my own humble writing-site, I posited back in ’08 that Obama was simply pandering to the masses. I was roundly shot-down on that score by the legions of people who wanted not just a president, but a genuine Savior for the Duration. I’ll grant them this leniency; they were all (mostly) under 40; many under 30 – none of them had been sufficiently pistol-whipped at the butt-end of Watergate to know that anyone who gets to the point of a national party nomination is a cocksucking liar.

    The real problem here is that we have no leaders who’ll stand up to the Elephant in the Room: The direct ownership of America by a cabal of corporate-capitalists who’ll cheerfully state that individual rights are expensive, hard to maintain, and of dubious value to the status quo (Lewis Lapham).

    At this point in our nation’s history, there’s no need to make a bet about dry-humping national monuments. Those of us who saw this coming back in the late ’80’s are actually either laughing at anyone who’s still left on the boat-deck, wishing them the best of what slim luck remains, or both. The lifeboats were welded there years ago.

    Bradley Manning is both patriot and fool, unless he fully realized the true consequences of his actions – in which case he’s a genuine hero, as well. Regardless, I wouldn’t give a twopenny damn for his prospects; he’s as fucked as any sorry-sod can get; a cautionary tale for anyone who tries to take on the Empire in its waning days.

    In the end, we shouldn’t be surprised at Obama. He’s one of them, and he’s only doing what he’s told.

    Wisconsin? In the end, it won’t matter. The average American is a docile, supine, reality-TV-watching, beer-swilling, carbohydrate-munching bovine moron who couldn’t possibly care less about Manning, Obama, or anything else – as long as he can keep the rent paid, his kids out of jail, and the panem et circenses coming to his wide-screen, served up cut-rate by the cable-company.

    My bet?

    Either we’ll end up with a military dictatorship-by-another-name (because the military is now the only organization with any structure which is also powerful enough to keep a lid on things and this whole polarized, sorry mess together), or we’ll see a version of Balkanization.

    (Actually, this is the best course of action, once you stop and think of it – we here in the Northwest could run a clean country; the southeast can commence Jim Crow and lynchings all over again; Nevada and New Mexico can unite and start grifting off each other; Arizona and Texas can form a nation based on Fundie ‘values’ – and shooting Mexicans.

    The midwest can form their own version of Little House on the Prairie; they can elect Michele Bachmann as their new president, and trade chickens for health care – we’ll see how that works out – and the Northeast can cling to the old Federal government and keep electing Republicrats to various offices to their heart’s content and talk about the Good Old Days.)

    The only thing you’ve got left is to wait until it’s time to vote again; then complain when it’s over than no one has a brain in America. I wish you well with this – because ‘hope’ and ‘change’ are not strategies, and wishful thinking isn’t going to straighten things ’round again.

    My suggestion?

    Quit wasting your energy writing about things like this. It’s time to piss on the fire, fold the cards, and call the game. Concentrate on something I did myself, recently: Find a plot of land someplace warm where they make rum and don’t have an army over 2,000.

    You’ll find that as you put those plans together, you won’t miss Wal-Mart or any of the other trappings of Empire – and when the place really goes to Hell (as it will, soon), you’ll have the unimaginable luxury of watching the last of the Empire’s True Believers smile as they go under.

    No; there’s no pleasure in it – but at least when it happens, the closest you’ll be is the distance between your couch and the television.

    -W

  3. So-o-o-o-o! What are you going to do about Obama? Support someone else for Prez in 2012? Give up on the DEMs? FINALLY? Work to start a new progressive party and run a Nader or a Feingold for President in 2012 along with every progressive we can get running against every Republican or Corporate Dem in the country? All that is needed to make this work is for YOU and the people who LISTEN to you to get out there and start working toward a different result in 2012 and a whole lot more! Are we Egyptians or another incarnation of Ghadaffi? I say we start with copying the Wisconsinites. They seem to have it down!

  4. I told eveyone I knew 3 years ago that the elections were meaningless – that it didn’t matter who ultimately won the office because the political class is practically a monolith. Regardless of their campaign promises (which aren’t worth a damn) or the party platform (as if those things were genuine at any point in time) they all have one real concern: maintain the status quo and reap big profits from it.

    My advice to all who have had it with this shell game called state – arm yourselves (I suggest nothing shy of an AK47 rifle or AR-15 variant and a high-quality side arm in 9mm, .40 cal or .45 cal), stock up on as many supplies as you can (food, water, portable shelters, etc…), sharpen your wilderness survival skills and prepare for war with the police state by forming local militias composed of individuals dedicated to defending their homes from federal power (preferably one with a strong core of disaffected military veterans – they have the skills and experience to train the others to fight as a cohesive unit). Just as the European partisans of old, we have to do battle with a rising fascist power: but unlike them we have the means to prepare in advance for their coming – let’s all take advantage of it while we can.

  5. {quote=PeteinDC]Join us Sunday. March 20th at 2 p.m. for a huge Free Bradley Rally, in Quantico, Virginia where he is being held![/quote]

    As much as i sympathize with the guy, he’s practically finished – no amount of protesting will ever set him free because he knows too much and is all too willing to talk. One way or another the state will destroy him and there isn’t a damn thing that can be done about it shy of sending an well-armed commando into Quantico to bust him out…

  6. Obama was, is , and will always be just another politician. He had NO intention of keeping his campaign promises. He started his administration bringing in corporate Fat Cats and lobbyists. He has never stopped. He is joined at the hip with Wall Street, Big Oil, Big Pharm, and the Military-Industrial Complex. He spins, triangualtes and obfuscates as much or more than Bush/Cheney. Four more years of this BS, and there wont be much of this country left to fight over. The Republican/Teanuts and the Democrats are both greed-driven and corrupt. Until the Sheeple are down to their last crumb, they won’t vote for a Third Party candidate. By then, the Corporate Fat Cats and the Corrupt Politicians will have left the sinking ship for luxury and comfort abroad, all of their ill-gotten gain waiting for them in offshore accounts. They do NOT care about the average citizen, except to fleece them for all they are worth, which grows less and less. The handbasket is full and headed for Hell.

  7. Thanks for all the feedback everyone. I’m happy to see the debate has turned to courses of action – i.e. whether to flee the country, as Astra said, stock up on automatic weapons a la Azazel, or simply find a way, as EDETHERED suggested, to tear it all down and start again.

    This piece was not intended to sway anybody’s opinion about Obama. Anyone who still believes he’s a Savior is not going to change his mind anytime soon, and anyone who agrees that he’s a mirror-image of Bush probably came to that conclusion long before this article was written. In short, I simply wanted to catalogue the downfall of what, in truth, was probably this country’s best hope for meaningful change within the system.

    A lot of very smart people – like Hunter Thompson, for example – were following and even believing in Obama years before he decided to run for president. We thought he had the balls and the national appeal to circumvent the partisan trapgame, to rally a mandate so large he could jam through anything he wanted. His highest approval rating, you remember, came in January/February 2009, right after the innauguration. He shut down Gitmo in a blink and ramped up the OIF drawdown with little resistance. Then, well… nothing.

    All of the policies that actually might have changed things – campaign finance reform, better public transport, higher taxes for private industry and the top 2% – were given up in favor of maintaining his Golden Boy image for the good of the party. And his failure, in the end, is the failure of our electoral process.

    The question I closed the article with – Who Next? – was meant to be rhetorical. It cannot be answered, for all of the reasons I listed in the article. If Obama – with all his intellegence and promise and lofty ideals – couldn’t change anything, there’s no logical reason to expect anyone else ever will. The Obama Problem is the American Problem, and Who Next is just another dumb gimmick to keep people believing in a broken political system.

    I agree the whole damn thing needs to be rebuilt from the ground up, but it will never happen without a large-scale shift in our national ontology. Too many Americans have accepted the fact that the government is a seperate, Wizard of OZ-like entity that tells them what to do and how much to pay. It will be a long, hard trek convincing this populace what self-government – Democracy – really means, and I’m still not sure how, or even if, it can be done at all.

    As for Courses of Action, I’m torn. For a while now I’ve been trying to find work in the Virgin Islands, as a reporter, barnicle scrubber, ANYTHING that could get me out of America for at least a year. But sometimes I get whimsical, I wonder if Change really is possible in this country. And if it is, I have a strong desire to be at the center of it. But that’s hope. And if Obama taught us anything, it’s that Hope is fuel for the lazy. What we need now is courage. We need more Bradley Mannings.

  8. “Hope is fuel for the lazy….”

    Oh, but we agree on that!

    I’m fond of saying that ‘hope is not a strategy’. Neither is luck. Sadly, those two are the only Muses we have left, and we’re sadly running headlong toward a rendezvous with the Three Fates.

    (The good news is that you don’t need a job to move. You need money. My advice? If you can, raise as much as possible. You can buy an acre in Belize for $12K. It’ll require sacrifice – but watching the Empire fall on TV, rather than suffering the effects live-and-in-person has a definite appeal.)

    As to being in the Center of Things, and attempting ‘change’ – remember; no one wants to change. We consultants and other businesspeople are told all the time to couch ‘change’ as any other term but that. Remember, also, that there are some Very Very Bad People who don’t want ‘change’. They want the status-quo, either to feed their cheerful optimism that they, too, will someday be a member of The Club (I speak of the Teabaggers and other semiliterate supporters of the regime), or they’ve got too goddamn much money to lose if real ‘change’ occurs (I speak in this case of the one-percent of America’s population Which Owns Positively Everything).

    You made a comment earlier that Obama had ‘closed down Gitmo’ – where was I? It’s still in operation – the American Gestapo might not be using those little brass warrant-discs to fill it with unfortunates any longer, but the place is still in operation – and they’re about to crank up the Imperial Tribunals again to deal with those who remain.

    We agree on this, also – the American voter is a moron who has no idea what real democracy looks like, or how to participate. To them, ‘government’ really is a modern-day Wizard-behind-the-curtain.

    Thing is, his time is almost up.

    What follows is anyone’s guess.

    -W

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.