<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Fallen Foreskin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://subversify.com/2010/03/12/the-fallen-foreskin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://subversify.com/2010/03/12/the-fallen-foreskin/</link>
	<description>An online magazine offering an alternative, subversive perspective to mainstream media.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:06:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: toronto condos</title>
		<link>http://subversify.com/2010/03/12/the-fallen-foreskin/comment-page-1/#comment-17638</link>
		<dc:creator>toronto condos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 21:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://subversify.com/?p=5504#comment-17638</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re a Really Skilled Blogger, Either have quality knowledge of what your talking about or you did some excellent research. Many thanks for this excellent posting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re a Really Skilled Blogger, Either have quality knowledge of what your talking about or you did some excellent research. Many thanks for this excellent posting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonia Studstill</title>
		<link>http://subversify.com/2010/03/12/the-fallen-foreskin/comment-page-1/#comment-14292</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonia Studstill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 14:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://subversify.com/?p=5504#comment-14292</guid>
		<description>this story cannot possibly be true... the US is the leader in medical breakthroughs... after all, thats why are premiums are so high.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this story cannot possibly be true&#8230; the US is the leader in medical breakthroughs&#8230; after all, thats why are premiums are so high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marni Dease</title>
		<link>http://subversify.com/2010/03/12/the-fallen-foreskin/comment-page-1/#comment-12294</link>
		<dc:creator>Marni Dease</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 17:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://subversify.com/?p=5504#comment-12294</guid>
		<description>Dear, I found your  Website  in a new directory of  Sites. I dont know how your  Site came up, must have been a typo, Your  Site looks good. Have a nice day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear, I found your  Website  in a new directory of  Sites. I dont know how your  Site came up, must have been a typo, Your  Site looks good. Have a nice day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://subversify.com/2010/03/12/the-fallen-foreskin/comment-page-1/#comment-8779</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 19:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://subversify.com/?p=5504#comment-8779</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by Circinfo: Guy tells story of his adult circumcision, why he is for infant circ &amp; refutes intactivist lies &quot;The Fallen Foreskin&quot; http://is.gd/aIAPQ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by Circinfo: Guy tells story of his adult circumcision, why he is for infant circ &amp; refutes intactivist lies &#8220;The Fallen Foreskin&#8221; <a href="http://is.gd/aIAPQ.." rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/aIAPQ..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh7</title>
		<link>http://subversify.com/2010/03/12/the-fallen-foreskin/comment-page-1/#comment-8596</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 23:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://subversify.com/?p=5504#comment-8596</guid>
		<description>@Nicole: &quot;babies can’t be traumatised&quot;? Are you crazy? Of course they bloody can! You abuse a baby, you&#039;ll get a twisted adult. (And with any luck, a long jail term.) This is akin to the &quot;babies can&#039;t feel pain&quot; myth that prevailed for decades.

They may not remember, but how long does it take them to forget? Taddio et al. found circumcised babies reacted differently to the pain of vaccination, months later.

Your anecdote about your boyfriend is hardly overwhelming statistical evidence for anything. Many men now - more thanks to the Internet - bitterly resent that the most sensitive part was cut off without any consideration for what they might want as men. 

I avoid the &quot;natural&quot; argument for the reasons you mention. But that doesn&#039;t mean that the foreskin isn&#039;t useful and valuable, and wouldn&#039;t have evolved away if it had been harmful. (It differs from the appendix in this regard. Apparently the appendix is genetically linked to the rest of the intestine, and can&#039;t be naturally missing without severe abnormality elsewhere. Aposthia - no foreskin - is a natural variant that would have become the norm long ago if it had been at all advantageous.)

As for the HIV studies, a study has just come out (Bassler et al., JAMA. 2010;303(12):1180-1187) showing that stopping a trial early makes it more likely to seem to show a benefit, even if there is none. All three of the African trials on which the claims for circumcision are based were stopped early. This is especially so where events  are few (less than 500). The total number of events (men becoming HIV+) in the three trials was 201 (65, 69 and 67).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nicole: &#8220;babies can’t be traumatised&#8221;? Are you crazy? Of course they bloody can! You abuse a baby, you&#8217;ll get a twisted adult. (And with any luck, a long jail term.) This is akin to the &#8220;babies can&#8217;t feel pain&#8221; myth that prevailed for decades.</p>
<p>They may not remember, but how long does it take them to forget? Taddio et al. found circumcised babies reacted differently to the pain of vaccination, months later.</p>
<p>Your anecdote about your boyfriend is hardly overwhelming statistical evidence for anything. Many men now &#8211; more thanks to the Internet &#8211; bitterly resent that the most sensitive part was cut off without any consideration for what they might want as men. </p>
<p>I avoid the &#8220;natural&#8221; argument for the reasons you mention. But that doesn&#8217;t mean that the foreskin isn&#8217;t useful and valuable, and wouldn&#8217;t have evolved away if it had been harmful. (It differs from the appendix in this regard. Apparently the appendix is genetically linked to the rest of the intestine, and can&#8217;t be naturally missing without severe abnormality elsewhere. Aposthia &#8211; no foreskin &#8211; is a natural variant that would have become the norm long ago if it had been at all advantageous.)</p>
<p>As for the HIV studies, a study has just come out (Bassler et al., JAMA. 2010;303(12):1180-1187) showing that stopping a trial early makes it more likely to seem to show a benefit, even if there is none. All three of the African trials on which the claims for circumcision are based were stopped early. This is especially so where events  are few (less than 500). The total number of events (men becoming HIV+) in the three trials was 201 (65, 69 and 67).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicole</title>
		<link>http://subversify.com/2010/03/12/the-fallen-foreskin/comment-page-1/#comment-8266</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://subversify.com/?p=5504#comment-8266</guid>
		<description>hahaha, yeah, I know about House... I&#039;m actually from Canada. Yay, Hugh Laurie! He&#039;s an amazing actor. BlackAdder!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hahaha, yeah, I know about House&#8230; I&#8217;m actually from Canada. Yay, Hugh Laurie! He&#8217;s an amazing actor. BlackAdder!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W.D. Noble</title>
		<link>http://subversify.com/2010/03/12/the-fallen-foreskin/comment-page-1/#comment-8249</link>
		<dc:creator>W.D. Noble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://subversify.com/?p=5504#comment-8249</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;… so I wonder where people who are against circumcisions stand in terms of those? They aren’t necessarily required either.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Over here on this side of the pond, there&#039;s a TV drama (House; M.D.) regarding the behavior of a rather-acerbic physician.  He made a comment about vaccinations which mirrored my mother&#039;s (the ICU nurse) attitude:

&lt;i&gt;&quot;Don&#039;t think they work?  The antibodies in &#039;yummy mummy&#039; only protect the kid for six months, which is why these companies think they can gouge you. They think that you&#039;ll spend whatever they ask to keep your kid alive. Want to change things? Prove them wrong. A few hundred parents like you decide they&#039;d rather let their kid die then cough up 40 bucks for a vaccination, believe me, prices will drop *really* fast.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Ever since we were able to fashion a crutch from a stick, humanity has been making things to interfere with the natural order of &lt;i&gt;dying&lt;/i&gt;.  Wheelchairs; contact-lenses; cosmetics - they all &#039;interfere&#039; with nature.

Nature is a cold-hearted &lt;i&gt;bitch&lt;/i&gt;, with little regard for us humans.

To my mind, screwing with nature - including vaccinating against everything from allergies to smallpox - is a damn good thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;… so I wonder where people who are against circumcisions stand in terms of those? They aren’t necessarily required either.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Over here on this side of the pond, there&#8217;s a TV drama (House; M.D.) regarding the behavior of a rather-acerbic physician.  He made a comment about vaccinations which mirrored my mother&#8217;s (the ICU nurse) attitude:</p>
<p><i>&#8220;Don&#8217;t think they work?  The antibodies in &#8216;yummy mummy&#8217; only protect the kid for six months, which is why these companies think they can gouge you. They think that you&#8217;ll spend whatever they ask to keep your kid alive. Want to change things? Prove them wrong. A few hundred parents like you decide they&#8217;d rather let their kid die then cough up 40 bucks for a vaccination, believe me, prices will drop *really* fast.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Ever since we were able to fashion a crutch from a stick, humanity has been making things to interfere with the natural order of <i>dying</i>.  Wheelchairs; contact-lenses; cosmetics &#8211; they all &#8216;interfere&#8217; with nature.</p>
<p>Nature is a cold-hearted <i>bitch</i>, with little regard for us humans.</p>
<p>To my mind, screwing with nature &#8211; including vaccinating against everything from allergies to smallpox &#8211; is a damn good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicole</title>
		<link>http://subversify.com/2010/03/12/the-fallen-foreskin/comment-page-1/#comment-8203</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 05:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://subversify.com/?p=5504#comment-8203</guid>
		<description>The &quot;natural&quot; argument is so flawed.  Most people get their wisdom teeth out because we&#039;ve evolved to not need them, and they cause more harm than good.  I&#039;ll also raise the point again of vaccinations - is that what you would call &quot;natural&quot;?  What IS natural? 

Funny how somebody wrote &quot;what kind of mother would assume that their child would have hygiene problems!&quot; lol That&#039;s just really funny.  &quot;Even&quot; in Western countries, men don&#039;t know how to wash themselves properly... just like the many women who think that it&#039;s a good idea to always wash their vaginas with soap (which causes infection.)  Most people don&#039;t know what to do with their own bodies, so it&#039;s safe to assume that there are quite a few cases of bad/not adequate hygiene, in both the East and the West, thus, infections galore. People don&#039;t necessarily go around spreading the news that they have them though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;natural&#8221; argument is so flawed.  Most people get their wisdom teeth out because we&#8217;ve evolved to not need them, and they cause more harm than good.  I&#8217;ll also raise the point again of vaccinations &#8211; is that what you would call &#8220;natural&#8221;?  What IS natural? </p>
<p>Funny how somebody wrote &#8220;what kind of mother would assume that their child would have hygiene problems!&#8221; lol That&#8217;s just really funny.  &#8220;Even&#8221; in Western countries, men don&#8217;t know how to wash themselves properly&#8230; just like the many women who think that it&#8217;s a good idea to always wash their vaginas with soap (which causes infection.)  Most people don&#8217;t know what to do with their own bodies, so it&#8217;s safe to assume that there are quite a few cases of bad/not adequate hygiene, in both the East and the West, thus, infections galore. People don&#8217;t necessarily go around spreading the news that they have them though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicole</title>
		<link>http://subversify.com/2010/03/12/the-fallen-foreskin/comment-page-1/#comment-8202</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 04:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://subversify.com/?p=5504#comment-8202</guid>
		<description>Hugh:
Just saying, but babies can&#039;t be traumatised.  Babies and even young children don&#039;t remember. Just because they cry, doesn&#039;t mean that they are traumatised.  Babies and young children hurt themselves and cry all the time. My tooth went through my lip/chin when I was young apparently, and I don&#039;t remember, even though I have a scar (Just as a bit of an example.) As for sensitivity, I know a lot of circumcised guys (who had it done at various ages, birth - 7 years old) who are quite promiscuous (i.e. they sleep around a lot, I&#039;m university age), and who are NORMAL. So really, I find it hard to believe that the supposed &quot;trauma&quot; and maybe slight decrease in sensitivity make as much difference as you and others theorise.  As I&#039;ve said, my bf got it done at 7, and he remembers the pain, but nothing else really, and he doesn&#039;t have any health or psychological issues because of a brief period of pain during his childhood :P He&#039;s rather indifferent and so are other people that I know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hugh:<br />
Just saying, but babies can&#8217;t be traumatised.  Babies and even young children don&#8217;t remember. Just because they cry, doesn&#8217;t mean that they are traumatised.  Babies and young children hurt themselves and cry all the time. My tooth went through my lip/chin when I was young apparently, and I don&#8217;t remember, even though I have a scar (Just as a bit of an example.) As for sensitivity, I know a lot of circumcised guys (who had it done at various ages, birth &#8211; 7 years old) who are quite promiscuous (i.e. they sleep around a lot, I&#8217;m university age), and who are NORMAL. So really, I find it hard to believe that the supposed &#8220;trauma&#8221; and maybe slight decrease in sensitivity make as much difference as you and others theorise.  As I&#8217;ve said, my bf got it done at 7, and he remembers the pain, but nothing else really, and he doesn&#8217;t have any health or psychological issues because of a brief period of pain during his childhood <img src='http://subversify.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />  He&#8217;s rather indifferent and so are other people that I know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicole</title>
		<link>http://subversify.com/2010/03/12/the-fallen-foreskin/comment-page-1/#comment-8189</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 03:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://subversify.com/?p=5504#comment-8189</guid>
		<description>I think that this is a really personal and important account about circumcision.  I don&#039;t know why people are pointing out that it isn&#039;t a &quot;coherent argument,&quot; considering you weren&#039;t necessarily trying to make a single argument, but pointing out problems that you see concerning how people view hygiene and circumcision.  Anyway, have you ever seen the show &quot;Embarrassing Bodies&quot;?  It&#039;s a British health show that I&#039;ve been watching a lot recently, and they taught grown men how to clean themselves and prevent infections, such as the ones that you mentioned... and that DO exist, despite people playing the ignorance card and saying &quot;I&#039;ve never heard of that happening!&quot;  I think that while there may be surgical complications that mainly have to do with age, it is so clear that people with a foreskin have to do more cleaning! It makes sense... logically! Obviously things are going to build up underneath, which doesn&#039;t necessarily happen when you don&#039;t have a foreskin.  Also, I may seem &quot;bias&quot; now, but my boyfriend got circumcised at about 7 years old, and he has no problems whatsoever, sexually or otherwise... He&#039;s actually pretty indifferent to the fact that he&#039;s circumcised.  I like how you provided us with further reading from both perspectives as well, and how you mentioned that the HIV study was inconclusive... the opposition doesn&#039;t mention this though, of course.  I am currently writing a research essay about this and it has been difficult to find sources that aren&#039;t just completely against it, with pictures of crying babies, and whatnot.  News Flash: Babies cry all the time... what about vaccinations? Not that I&#039;m saying that circumcision is equal to vaccination... but you are injecting your baby with chemicals via a huge needle, and I&#039;m pretty sure that I even remember crying, and having to go back several times.  There are also complications with vaccinations as well... so I wonder where people who are against circumcisions stand in terms of those?  They aren&#039;t necessarily required either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that this is a really personal and important account about circumcision.  I don&#8217;t know why people are pointing out that it isn&#8217;t a &#8220;coherent argument,&#8221; considering you weren&#8217;t necessarily trying to make a single argument, but pointing out problems that you see concerning how people view hygiene and circumcision.  Anyway, have you ever seen the show &#8220;Embarrassing Bodies&#8221;?  It&#8217;s a British health show that I&#8217;ve been watching a lot recently, and they taught grown men how to clean themselves and prevent infections, such as the ones that you mentioned&#8230; and that DO exist, despite people playing the ignorance card and saying &#8220;I&#8217;ve never heard of that happening!&#8221;  I think that while there may be surgical complications that mainly have to do with age, it is so clear that people with a foreskin have to do more cleaning! It makes sense&#8230; logically! Obviously things are going to build up underneath, which doesn&#8217;t necessarily happen when you don&#8217;t have a foreskin.  Also, I may seem &#8220;bias&#8221; now, but my boyfriend got circumcised at about 7 years old, and he has no problems whatsoever, sexually or otherwise&#8230; He&#8217;s actually pretty indifferent to the fact that he&#8217;s circumcised.  I like how you provided us with further reading from both perspectives as well, and how you mentioned that the HIV study was inconclusive&#8230; the opposition doesn&#8217;t mention this though, of course.  I am currently writing a research essay about this and it has been difficult to find sources that aren&#8217;t just completely against it, with pictures of crying babies, and whatnot.  News Flash: Babies cry all the time&#8230; what about vaccinations? Not that I&#8217;m saying that circumcision is equal to vaccination&#8230; but you are injecting your baby with chemicals via a huge needle, and I&#8217;m pretty sure that I even remember crying, and having to go back several times.  There are also complications with vaccinations as well&#8230; so I wonder where people who are against circumcisions stand in terms of those?  They aren&#8217;t necessarily required either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

