A Timely Question: Should Sarah Palin and Her Daughters Be Sterilized?

davidsarah

by Mitchell Warren

Right about now, the world is wondering how acerbic TV talk show host David Letterman will respond to Sarah Palin’s Godzilla-Mom-Attacks campaign. Sarah has insinuated that he should publicly apologize not to her but to young women and feminist groups all over the nation. Meanwhile, dozens of right wing publications are calling for Letterman’s firing and even semi-important people (at least in the sense that they are looking for their 15 minutes of fame) like Brian Kolb, the Minority Leader for the New York State Assembly, are organizing anti-Dave campaigns. In case you missed the 30 second nightmare, Letterman’s joke went something like this:


“One awkward moment for Sarah Palin at the Yankee game, during the seventh inning, her daughter was knocked up by Alex Rodriguez.”


It was a self-professed tasteless and cheap joke written to amuse the cynical and freezing cold Ed Sullivan Theater audience. It was comparable to any hundred other cheap and tasteless jokes that would be ratted off by Leno, Conan or heaven forbid even Carson Daly. What’s fairly obvious to me is that:


(A) This celebrity flame war is being crafted by two master manipulators of the media; Letterman for higher ratings and Palin to help promote her future presidential campaign.


(B) This is a sorry excuse for a war that was staged just so liberals and conservatives and Democrats and Republicans could fan the flames of hatred and continue to impress us with their never-ending rhetoric. (Just check out who’s fighting for whom and how clearly party lines are delineated)


(C) Firing or even punishing David Letterman for continuing to do what he does is a dangerous precedent that recalls Nixon-ian censorship. (Read this interesting piece by George Schlatter for more on this thought) Letterman’s shtick is his edgy everyman anti-authoritarian wit that actually permeates all late night talk shows in the modern era. If you dare to censor the king of late night cynicism, then you take one huge step backward into PC Mommy Police territory.


I now propose a more challenging question: Should Sarah Palin and her daughters be sterilized? Sarah Palin caused some controversy in 2008, when on April 18th she gave birth to Trig Palin, a child that Palin initially tried to hide from the public but then decided like any untapped Alaskan resource, could be used in her Vice Presidential campaign. Palin commented, “Not knowing in my own heart if I was going to be ready to embrace a child with special needs, I couldn’t talk about it.”


Eventually Palin reached the conclusion that it could be talked about (and exploited), and from that moment on, Palin has never once resisted keeping her family out of the limelight. In fact, she made the extended Palin family a focal part of her future campaign as president, a campaign which according to some Republican suck-ups, she still “hasn’t decided yet.”


Palin had the nerve to preach family values while her own daughter Bristol Palin was getting knocked up by Levi Johnston. This embarrassing event was followed by Bristol’s public statement that she was now preaching abstinence. The loser in all of this? Levi Johnston, of course, who now has a baby to take care of but with no sex privileges.


The real shocker is not that Letterman is so cruel, or that the nation is so fickle. What’s truly amazing is that Letterman is getting railed for calling a spade a spade—to say that Bristol was knocked up is not a mean spirited joke, but a candidly honest evaluation that elicits laughs because, as Homer Simpsons says, “It’s funny because it’s true.”


Now the Palin camp, so anxious to rally the Christian mommy troops to their corner, argues for a technicality. Willow was at the baseball game, not Bristol. This tells me one of two things; first that Letterman doesn’t care about technicalities and had no idea who was actually at the game. Second, that Letterman realizes a very serious issue:


The Palin family cannot be stopped from breeding. We are living in an age where PETA and animal activists are raising a ruckus over excessive animal population. They tell us to spay and neuter our cats. Yet, somehow Roman Catholic mommies who believe in God are allowed to deliver child after child much to the nation’s chagrin. Well, I won’t bother speaking my radical beliefs on how mankind has yet to prove superiority to the animals. (After all, I enjoy PBS footage of nature much more than I do Eddie Murphy films) Instead, I will suggest that while the Palins have the right to contribute to the overpopulation of humankind, do we not have the right to make fun of their hypocrisy?


Every once in a while there comes a special politician with the amazing ability to insert her foot completely in her mouth, and I believe this is the type stupidity that deserves to be laughed at. The human side of me, yes even the maternal side of me, honestly believes that If Palin was so protective of her daughters then she shouldn’t have paraded them around in front of the whole country and demanded they share her celebrity. The whole argument is bullshit since John McCain and Rush Limbaugh didn’t seem to have any problem making fun of the Clinton children, who like the Obama children, haven’t really done much worthy of negative news media coverage.


No, I don’t really want to organize a rally to help promote the sterilizations of the baby-spewing Palin family. However, I absolutely defend Letterman’s right to make jokes about stupid people who think they are above criticism. If you start censoring Letterman’s sense of humor, it would send a very strong conservative message to the nation, suggesting that it’s not okay to laugh at hypocrisy and that just because someone has children they are somehow above answering to the people for their sins. That sounds very um, how shall we say, Royal Family?


If we have the right to criticize our politicians, we have the right to laugh. It’s not always an amusing thought, to laugh at this misfortune of others, but it is only human, quintessentially American, and the very essence of freedom.


AND NOW A PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT FROM SUBVERSIFY.COM


Please people, spay and neuter yourself.

8 Comments on “A Timely Question: Should Sarah Palin and Her Daughters Be Sterilized?”

  1. Mitch, as you know, there are certain elements of media broadcasting that i dislike, so i generally ignore; opening the doors to people’s bedrooms is one of them. I believe in the privacy of the individual. My criticism has been and remains, the gross enjoyment of scandal that has nothing to do with the issues. We all suffer when this type of mentality seizes the media, but the ones who suffer worst are the children; the young movie stars, the heirs of the rich and famous; they have no private lives. America devours them in its voyeurism, than wonders why they are ill-adjusted.

    Usually, this type of mongering is nothing more than a distraction to real issues, but in her usual bullying, self-justified manner, Sarah Palin has brought what should have been a matter of personal choice and discretion out into the open and not only has demanded a public apology but has begun the machinery of censorship; which involves us all as a free citizenry.

    Sarah Palin is a very dangerous woman. Her tenure as mayor of Wasilla were years of rampant paving over of farmland for strip malls, disorganized road systems and flagrant abuse of the foster child care placement agency. While acting governor with important issues on the table, such as alternative energy solutions, clean water acts, the fishery crisis and the ongoing corruption investigations into favoritism and special interest practices, she abandoned her post and ran for vice-presidency. In the same manner she has brought her dysfunctional family to the suface,touting the same right wing horn of Christian justice as the nightmare that has plunged us into eternal debt, she brought Alaska’s entire tottering legal system to the examination of the candid world.

    Let the wary eye be unclouded. This is no longer an issue of tasteless jokes among a sexually oriented audience. This is the issue of one woman who earned the name “barracuda” because of a determination to win at all costs. She has absolutely no desire to represent the good of the people, only her self-interest. She speaks of transparency than tries to cover her lies. To allow that woman one footstep over the treshold is to decimate the process of free speech.

    Speaking of Sarah’s deceit, i still often wonder about her baby. The entire mystery around the little guy is rather bizarre. She never really appeared pregnant; always wearing the same trim suits; and then to top the surprise, the baby was born on an airplane.

  2. Karla, that is very interesting about little Trig, I didn’t know that..maybe she is an attention whore….Ouch my cheek hurts!!
    Anyway Mitch yes we always have the right and I think the responsiblity to make fun of hypocracy. And it is my feeling that families should make decisions about whether or not they support a member being in the limelight. There is no way to keep them out of it. As you mention the Royal Family issue I would like to point out that the royal family would never have responded to this joke, they have more class and are born and bred to public life, they know how to take their licks and they also know how to apologise when they have to then move on saying nothing more. If American families like the Palin family are going to push us to make them part of our government and culture, they need to decide to behave better and not respond with shock at every needling.
    Was David Letterman distateful? Yes. So what it’s his job. Calling for his firing is ludicrous if they are going to call for him to be fired I want Bill O’Riley retro-actively fired.

  3. Gee, Mitch the article on that web site sounded almost like something you would write; if i didn’t happen to know your general distaste for political writing. Letterman showed manners and personal character by acquising to the sensitivities of mothers. I still don’t really feel like watching him on late night television; not unless he wants to tackle some really ballsy subjects besides young girls and Esquire styled scandals; but he just gained a measure of respect in my eyes. The bleats to remove him is plain ill-mannered.

  4. I’m a homeowner and our average monthly bill is around $125 give or take $25. I’d love to install a wind turbine if it would work efficiently and cut our costs. I have no clue and would like to avoid days of research and defer to a professional if it is viable cost wise to try this project. I know there may be green grants or special financing available but again have no clue about total costs, pay back venues such as years to return investment and options for even more then one turbine. We are in a bit of a forced wind tunnel because of wall and home placement so we have abundant resources. Any heads up information would be very helpful.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.